2048 2920 The Campaign for the National Museum of the United States Army
1

Borrowed Soldiers:  The American 27th and 30th Divisions and the British Army on the Ypres Front, August-September 1918

Written By: Mitchell Yockelson

Ypres, or “Wipers,” as the British Tommies called the ancient Belgian city, is synonymous with World War I.  An extraordinary number of lives were lost there and in the nearby salient during seemingly endless fighting over the course of four years.  Numerous monuments and cemeteries dot the landscape and remind one of the horrors of war.  One such monument pays tribute to the American 27th and 30th Divisions.  These two divisions, comprised largely of National Guard troops, received their baptism of fire on 30 August-1 September 1918, when they engaged veteran German forces on one of the area’s highest points, Kemmel Hill, and the surrounding villages of Vierstraat, Vormezeele, and Wytschaete.  The Germans had gained the positions in April of that year but were in retreat when the Americans arrived.  Nonetheless, they refused to retire quietly and, in the process, taught the eager doughboys a lesson in combat along the Western Front.

Ruins of St. Martin's Church in Ypres, Belgium, ca. 1918. (War Dept.) EXACT DATE SHOT UNKNOWN NARA FILE #: 165-FC-13-1 WAR & CONFLICT BOOK #: 696

Ruins of St. Martin’s Church in Ypres, Belgium, ca. 1918. (War Dept.)

When this operation commenced, the Americans were into the second phase of instruction by the best soldiers the Allies had to offer.  Soon after arriving on the Western Front in the spring of 1918, the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) commander General John J. Pershing reluctantly sent the 27th and 30th Divisions to train with the British Army.  It was his way of appeasing Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig, who insisted that American doughboys amalgamate into the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) to fill the ranks of his depleted army.  Pershing, however, had other plans.  He sought to form an independent army and resisted the constant pressure from Haig.  It was only when the U.S. War Department accepted an offer from the British to transport American troops to Europe that Pershing allowed Americans to train with Haig’s Tommies.  Additionally, Pershing agreed that the British would equip, feed, and arm his men, and that they could also be utilized at the front should an emergency arise.  Under this program of training, ten American divisions spent time in the British sector as the American II Corps.  The agreement also benefited the Americans since the War Department lacked the shipping to send troops overseas, nor did it have enough arms on hand to issue them to every soldier.

Peace between the two commanders, however, was diminished when Pershing reassigned eight of the divisions to his newly organized American First Army.  Pershing wanted all ten divisions back, but Haig vehemently protested and was allowed to keep two—the 27th and 30th.  They remained behind as the AEF’s smallest corps.

Haig now had about 50,000 fresh American soldiers to utilize as he saw fit.  An AEF division comprised roughly 27,000 officers and men, but the 27th and 30th never reached this strength. Their artillery brigades arrived in France separately and were immediately assigned to First Army.  Pershing also did not allot replacements to the 27th and 30th until after the Armistice, a sign that he considered them of lesser importance than his other divisions.

Prior to arriving in France, the 27th Division trained at Camp Wadsworth, South Carolina, near Asheville, North Carolina, and the Blue Ridge Mountains.  Most Army divisions were sent to the milder southern and southeastern United States for training. “Nights were bitterly cold, but the sun would be scorching hot during the day,” Private William F. Clarke, a member of the 104th Machine Gun Battalion, vividly recalled.  It was not uncommon to come back from either “a day on the drill field or from a ten mile hike, perspiring profusely, and then almost freeze to death at night.”

Major General John F. O’Ryan was the 27th Division’s commander and the highest-ranking National Guard officer to command such a large contingent of troops during the war.  He was a disciplinarian and his troops were recognized for their professional demeanor that ranked alongside units of the Regular Army.  The division was comprised of troops from all over New York, including men from some of New York City’s most prominent families, as well as farmers and laborers from all over the Empire State.  Prior to service overseas, the New Yorkers were sent to the Mexican border in 1916 during the Punitive Expedition as the 6th Division, the only Guard unit organized in this fashion.  The 27th Division adopted an insignia that consisted of a red-bordered black circle with the letters “NYD” in monogram with the stars of the constellation Orion, in honor of their commanding officer.

The 30th Division was more typical of the National Guard.  A composite of regiments from North and South Carolina, and Tennessee, the division came together at Camp Sevier, near Greenville, South Carolina.  During the course of the war, nine different general officers commanded the division until the Army settled on a West Point classmate of Pershing, Major General Edward M. Lewis, who had previously led 3d Infantry Brigade, 2d Division.  The 30th Division, nicknamed “Old Hickory” after President Andrew Jackson, included units whose lineage dated back to the War of 1812.   Like those of the 27th, the regiments of the 30th Division regiments had served on the Mexican border during the Punitive Expedition.

A soldier boy of the 71st Regiment Infantry, New York National Guard, saying good bye to his sweetheart as his regiment leaves for Camp Wadsworth, Spartanburg, S.C., where the New York Division trained for service. 1917. IFS. (War Dept.) Exact Date Shot Unknown NARA FILE #: 165-WW-476-21 WAR & CONFLICT BOOK #: 461

A soldier boy of the 71st Regiment Infantry, New York National Guard, saying good bye to his sweetheart as his regiment leaves for Camp Wadsworth, Spartanburg, S.C., where the New York Division trained for service. 1917. IFS.

For more than eight months, both divisions underwent intense physical fitness training, conducted maneuvers in open warfare, and attended lectures from British and French officers sent to the United States as advisors.  Units of the 27th and 30th Divisions began arriving in France during the last week of May 1918.  Entering the ports of Calais and Brest, the Americans were welcomed to the war zone with the distant thunder of artillery pieces and nightly German air raids.  After days of hard marching, both divisions were assigned to a sector behind the British front lines to begin training.  To ensure compatibility with the British soldiers, the Americans were required to trade their beloved .30 caliber Model 1917 rifles for the Lee-Enfield Mark III.

The training program designed specifically for these divisions consisted of ten weeks of instruction for infantry and machine gun troops to be carried out in three periods.  First, they trained out of line for a minimum of four weeks, encompassing drill, musketry, and physical exercise.  This included tutoring in the Lewis machine gun and other infantry weapons.  Next, the Americans were to attach with British troops in the line for three weeks.   Officers and noncommissioned officers would enter for a forty-eight-hour period, while the men joined up with British companies and platoons for shorter periods.  Finally, each regiment was to train in a rear area for three to four weeks to provide more advanced instruction.  There, the Americans would practice maneuvering battalions and companies.  For the most part the doughboys and Tommies got along well. Not surprisingly though, the Americans complained about the British rations.  Accustomed to American food served in large portions, they were instead issued a small meat ration, tea (instead of coffee), and cheese.

During the second period of training, the 27th and 30th Divisions were assigned to the British Second Army for training and moved to their sector, southwest of Ypres, to organize and defend a portion of the East Poperinghe Line.  The position took its name from the town of Poperhinghe, situated several kilometers north and consisting of an irregular system of unconnected trenches, strongholds, and pillboxes.

During the first part of August, the 30th Division moved near Poperhinghe and Watou, where it came under the tactical control of the British II Corps, while the 27th assumed the second, or reserve, position in the British defenses near Kemmel Hill, under the command of British XIX Corps.  This included Dickebusch Lake and the Scherpenberg areas.

Eventually, the 30th advanced to the same reserve sector as the 27th, leaving both on the north face of the Lys salient, a front that covered 4,000 yards.  The salient was formed in the Allied line south of Ypres in the spring of 1918 when the Germans attacked along the Lys River during Operation Georgette and took Kemmel Hill from the French.  A British officer wrote that the “loss of Kemmel by the French is good; we held it anyhow; it should make them less uncivil.”

The salient extended from Zillebeke Lake, at one time the chief water supply for Ypres, to the southeast of Voormezeele.  It had been shaped by the fighting of First Ypres in 1914, and the subsequent fighting had created deep craters.  The ground was very low, and shell holes became small pools.  Surrounding the salient was the high ground—Observatory Ridge, Passchendaele Ridge, Messines-Wytschaete Ridge, and Kemmel Hill, all held by the Germans.  These positions allowed the enemy a clear field of fire in all directions.  An American observed that often the “men in the forward systems believed they were being shelled by their own artillery, when, as a matter of fact, the shells were from the enemy guns on the right and in the rear.”

Battalions of the 30th Division’s 119th and 120th Infantry Regiments began occupying portions of the front in the Canal sector, ten miles southwest of Ypres.  One regiment had its camp at “Dirty Bucket,” about four miles from Ypres.  Soldiers were housed in huts built by the British in a grove of oak trees big enough to house an entire company (256 officers and men).  Quarters were far from luxurious—a lack of cots or bunks meant soldiers slept on the floor.  For the commanding and staff officers of the 27th and 30th, however, it was much different.  The 27th maintained headquarters at Oudezeele, while the 30th Division set up its command in Watou, where O’Ryan and Lewis slept in relative comfort.  Many of the divisions’ staff and senior regimental officers were housed in what were called “Armstrong Hut.”  Collapsible and easily moved, the sides of the huts were banked with sand bags to protect the occupants from shrapnel and shell fragments should an artillery round burst nearby.  The banks of sand bags were three feet high, “just enough to cover you when lying on the cot.”

Wall scaling at Camp Wadsworth, S.C. Ca. 1918. Paul Thompson. (War Dept.) Exact Date Shot Unknown NARA FILE #: 165-WW-151B-8 WAR & CONFLICT BOOK #: 448

Wall scaling at Camp Wadsworth, S.C. Ca. 1918. Paul Thompson. (War Dept.)

Both divisions were now only four miles from the front and well within range of enemy artillery.  On 13 July, Private Robert P. Friedman, a member of the 102d Engineers, died as a result of wounds from German shellfire and became the first combat casualty suffered by the 27th Division.  Friedman was one of many Jewish soldiers, both officers and enlisted men, in the 27th, and his loss was mourned by all in the division.  The 30th Division had its first combat-related death a month earlier, when First Lieutenant Wily O. Bissett of the 119th Infantry, was killed in a similar manner on 17 June.

In Belgium, the Americans witnessed the hardships suffered by the civilian population.  Although shelling had all but destroyed the villages around Ypres, it failed to break the spirit of the Flemish people.   As farmers continued to cultivate their fields, engineers from the American divisions on the East Poperinghe Defense Line were specifically instructed not to damage the crops.  This was a difficult order to follow since the laying of wire entanglements near the front meant clearing some of the crops despite protests from the farmers.

Over the course of several nights, 16-24 August, the 27th and 30th Divisions prepared for combat.  The 30th Division ordered its 60th Infantry Brigade to take over the Canal sector from the British 33d Division, located on the north face of the Lys salient southwest of Ypres.  The 119th Infantry was on the right side of the line, the 120th Infantry on its left.  In reserve was the 59th Infantry Brigade (117th and 118th Infantry Regiments).  A week later, the 53d Infantry Brigade (105th and 106th Infantry Regiments), 27th Division, relieved the British 6th Division in the Dickebusch sector.  It took over the front and support positions with regiments side by side and the 54th Infantry Brigade (107th and 108th Infantry Regiments) in reserve.  The British divisions left their artillery units to support the Americans.

Troop movements, as well as the transport of supplies, were carried out by light railway and conducted during the night to avoid attracting fire from German artillery on Kemmel Hill.  In advance of infantry and machine gun units were the 102d (27th Division) and 105th (30th Division) Engineers.  They had the difficult and dangerous task of repairing pockmarked roads, made nearly impassable after three years of shellfire.  Once the troops reached the front, they were quartered in wooden huts built by British engineers.  Two squads of eight men, with a corporal in charge, slept in a hut, which one occupant described as spacious.  To coordinate liaison between the infantry and the artillery, work details had to lay cable.  This meant digging a six foot trench through the hard Flanders clay that was not unlike the soil of South Carolina.

Each day involved surveillance from observation posts and airplanes.  The first few days were reported as calm.  A “quiet, inoffensive attitude,” is how a 30th Division officer summarized this period.  Such calm, however, did not last.  Suddenly, as the division’s historians noted, “the scene had now shifted to the battleground of the World War—a stern and terrible reality to the men of all ranks.”  They were referring to night patrols sent out as far as 1,000 yards to probe enemy defenses.  Troops patrolling too close to the German outpost lines were greeted with machine gun fire.

At first, the Germans were unaware that Americans had entered the sector opposite them, but according to a prisoner interrogated at 27th Division headquarters, this changed when the rifle fire became “more brisk and haphazard.”  When asked to elaborate, the soldier from the German 93d Infantry Regiment explained that soldiers “who have been in the war for some time only fire individually when they are sure they have a target, whereas new troops are apt to fire more or less constantly at night, whether or not they have a target.”  The considerable shooting and muzzle flashes allowed the Germans to better pinpoint the American line of advance.  Once they recognized that untested American troops were opposing them, it became a daily ritual to try their mettle by harassing them with artillery fire, lobbing shells into back areas to hit crossroads and villages.

On 30 August, the enemy conducted a surprise move that further tested the doughboys.  In the early morning, heavy clouds of smoke crept toward the American lines.  An initial report said it was a gas attack, but further observation revealed the Germans were burning dumps of some kind to mask a withdrawal.  A prisoner captured near Kemmel Hill confirmed the updated report when he told interrogators that troops were retiring to the Wytschaete-Messines Ridge.  He claimed a new line was established in front of Armentieres, and that eight men per company in machine gun posts remained behind on Kemmel, where they were to give the impression of strength.5

That night British XIX Corps headquarters ordered O’Ryan to send patrols from his brigades to reconnoiter the left of the line, opposite the 30th Division.  This order was not unexpected.  Earlier in the day O’Ryan and Plumer met and the latter remarked casually after tea, “Oh, by the way, O’Ryan, how would you like to have a go at our friends on the ridge?”  O’Ryan responded that “his men were there for that purpose,” and was then told by Plumer to have a word with his chief of staff.  O’Ryan then discovered that the details of the plan and tentative corps order were already in place.

O’Ryan went into action and instructed the 53d Brigade to move elements of the 105th and 106th Infantry Regiments toward the German trenches to determine the depth of the withdrawal.  As they approached the German lines, there was minor resistance from scattered machine gun posts.  The patrols were accompanied by members of the British 184th Tunneling Company, which checked the vacant enemy dugouts for mines and booby traps.  After reaching the enemy positions, the patrols reported back to brigade headquarters that the prisoner’s statement was correct—the Germans had given up most of Kemmel Hill.  Additional patrols were organized and told to be ready to advance in support of those sent out.  Soon, the Americans were gearing up for their first battle as entire regiments.

On 31 August, the British II Corps ordered the 30th Division to send out patrols in its sector to determine enemy strength and location.  The division commander, Major General Lewis, chose the 60th Infantry Brigade and made it clear that if strong resistance was met, the brigade was to return to its entrenchments.  Small parties from the 119th and 120th Infantry Regiments moved out, and like those of the 53d Brigade, found the German defenses at Kemmel Hill mostly abandoned.  Additional parties from the 30th Division held nearby positions at the Voormezeele Switch and Lock 8 of the canal.  The Germans were still close by in strength, so Lewis ordered his troops to hold tight and await further orders.  Relaying messages was difficult because the Germans kept a close eye on the runners and frequently fired on them, so the Americans mostly communicated by wire.  To ensure there was little delay in this method, the 105th Signal Battalion laid 15,000 feet of cable along this position to establish a forward communications post.

At 0730 the next morning, Lewis gave the order to advance.  After a brief barrage, a platoon of forty men from Company I, 120th Infantry, moved forward towards Lankhof Farm.  There, the Germans had constructed a cluster of pillboxes in the ruins of an old farm building and positioned machine gunners and snipers.  As the Americans advanced, the Germans withdrew to the canal and abandoned their defenses at the farm, suffering only two casualties.  The platoon then pushed beyond the farm and established contact with the 119th Infantry advancing on the right of Lock 8.   Artillery from the British 33d Division fired in support, but several rounds fell short, wounding a number of Americans.

Friendly fire incidents were an unfortunate consequence of war, and the 30th Division had recently lost two men this way.  In the first instance, First Lieutenant Robert H. Turner of the 115th Machine Gun Battalion was struck on 24 July by a shell from the 186 Battery, Royal Field Artillery, while he and another officer were on patrol near a Belgian chateau.  In the second occurrence, Second Lieutenant Lowell T. Wasson of Company M, 120th Infantry, was shot by a private from his unit on 7 August.  Wasson apparently became confused after returning from a patrol near Swan Chateau and had entered a listening post unannounced.  The private guarding the post was ordered to fire on Wasson by his superiors, who thought the intruder was a German conducting a trench raid.

With the 119th taking fire from both its own artillery support and the Germans, two more platoons from the 120th Infantry were sent forward to help relieve the chaotic situation.  After advancing 1,000 yards, they retired, having lost touch with both flanks.  The Germans complicated matters with fire from trench mortars and machine guns hidden in Ravine Wood.  At 1000, 2d Battalion, 119th Infantry, advanced and held on against heavy resistance.  During this action, a patrol that included Corporal Burt T. Forbes of Company I, was acting as a flank guard when a squad of eight Germans approached.  As the enemy started setting up their machine guns, Forbes charged the Germans, single-handedly killing three and driving the other five away.  For this act of bravery, he was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross and the French Croix de Guerre.  Word of the action was sent to the rear by pigeon.  It was the first time this means of communication had been used by the 30th.  Remarkably, only one hour and five minutes elapsed between the time the message was sent, received and transmitted by the division staff.

After intense fighting, the 30th Division’s contribution to the operation was over.  It gained one square mile of ground, inflicted one hundred German casualties, and captured sixteen prisoners, two machine guns, one grenade launcher, and a small amount of ammunition and stores.  Kemmel Hill was now in Allied hands and, as one doughboy remarked, “it sure is a blessed relief to move around without feeling the German eyes watching you.”  In the process of taking this coveted piece of land, the 30th lost two officers and thirty-five men killed.6

In the 27th Division sector, the British XIX Corps ordered O’Ryan to begin advancing his division at 1000 on 31 August and occupy a line along the Vierstraat Switch, 1,000 yards from their present location.  Patrols from the 106th Infantry advanced along the line until held up for three hours by machine guns concealed in numerous nests near Siege Farm.  The Americans retaliated with their own machine guns, and artillery fire from the British 66th Division.  By 1730, the Germans had been driven back and the objective gained.

August ended as another bloody month on the Western Front, and September started off the same way.  On the morning of 1 September, the 105th Infantry went forward on its right to pivot on the 30th Division at Vierstraat Village.  As the Americans attempted to advance to the east crest of Vierstraat Ridge, the Germans continued to resist and drove the Americans back to the village.  During the fighting, the doughboys used some creative methods to send messages to the rear; the 102d Signal Battalion sent messages using pigeons and dogs.  Amazingly, the dogs successfully maneuvered over broken ground, under heavy fire to deliver messages.

Despite such valiant efforts, communication was still difficult, as reflected in a frantic field message sent from 1st Battalion, 105th Infantry:  “Our new position very heavily shelled, making communications almost impossible…request that artillery open fire on hill opposite our new position.”  Information on why the regiment was stalled did not reach brigade headquarters until late in the day on 1 September.  Messages were delayed because shellfire had cut the forward communication wire.  To help remedy the troubling situation, Corporal Kenneth M. McCann of the 102d Field Signal Battalion worked for seventy-two hours, while subjected to repeated gas bombardments and machine gun fire, to replace the forward line near Kemmel Hill.  For his extraordinary efforts, he was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross.

More discouraging news reached the rear from an officer observing at the front.  On the left of the 106th Infantry, two battalions had become badly mixed up and crowded into the line.  When word reached the 53d Infantry Brigade commander, Brigadier General Albert H. Blanding, he ordered the commander of the 106th, Colonel William A. Taylor, to the front to investigate.  Taylor reported two hours later that the officer in command at the front, Major Harry S. Hildreth, had “apparently entirely lost control and seemed at a loss as to what to do.”  Blanding ordered Taylor to immediately relieve Hildreth and take command.  Not until daylight the following morning was the situation in hand.   Hildreth was only temporarily reprimanded.  He was lucky this was his only punishment since it was commonplace in the AEF, as well as the BEF, to permanently relieve commanders from their units for poor performance.  Hildreth returned to battalion command in the 106th a few days later.

On 1 September, Blanding ordered his brigade not to make a general attack, but to advance the front line as far as possible.  With the help of artillery harassment, the two regiments moved forward, and by the afternoon of the next day, had captured the southern slope of Wytschaete Ridge.  At noon on 2 September, Taylor phoned Blanding and requested permission to dig in on the line of the first objective and wait for relief.  His request was denied.  Instead, he was ordered to advance further, and after another day of hard fighting, the 106th permanently reoccupied the Chinese Trench, which ran between the Berghe and Byron Farms.  By now, the Germans had retired in some strength to Wytschaete Ridge.  The two-day operation ended with the 53d Brigade losing two officers and seventy-seven men killed, mostly from artillery fire.

On 3 September, the Americans received withdrawal orders, and moved back from the Canal and Dickebusch sectors during the next two days.  The British 41st Division relieved the 27th, and the British 35th Division took the sector vacated by the 30th.  Relief of the 27th did not go smoothly.  When the order reached the 53d Brigade, it was so far forward that it took a considerable amount of time to reach the light railways for transportation to the rear.  After reaching the rear, the brigade found that the 41st Division was in the midst of moving forward, and considerable congestion ensued.  Once behind the front lines, the soldiers of the 27th Division, looking forward to warm beds and clean uniforms, discovered that billeting and bathing facilities were hard to find.  O’Ryan later wrote that provisions had been made for his men, “but the lack of time and other circumstances prevented it being done to the fullest extent.”  For the men of 30th Division, it was also “rather a hard trip, but the men stood it well,” remembered the commander of the 105th Engineers.  “The cars were dirty and those for the First Battalion had manure in them when they were backed on the siding.  Our men had to clean them out and then buy straw to put on the bottom of the cars.  I may be mistaken, but the trains the British use for a trip like this are better and cleaner cars.  We seem to be the ‘Goats’.”The workhorse of the British Army, the Short Magazine Lee Enfield could be fired so quickly that at the battle of Mons in 1914, German troops thought they were under machine gun fire.1942/43 British S.M.L.E. No. 1 Mark III Bolt-Action Box-Magazine Rifle (repeater/ breech-loading/ smokeless powder/ cartridge ammunition) Used in both World Wars, the Short Magazine, Lee Enfield No. 1 remained particularly popular with Canadian forces. Actually adopted in 1907, the improved Mark III served well in jungle and in desert warfare applications, where it was used extensively. Like the Germans, the British did not adopt a semi-automatic rifle for primary use in the Second World War. This was due mostly to the unavailability of sufficient factory space and production capacity. Therefore, most semi-autos that were used by the British came from the United States. In the main, the Mark III proved to be very satisfactory, particularly when supported with fire from machine guns. --Dr. William L. Roberts, THE AMERICAN LIBERTY COLLECTION; #143 The British government armory at Enfield Lock, Middlesex, was founded in 1804 to assemble Brown Bess muskets for use by the country's military forces. As with the U.S. armories at Springfield, Massachusetts and Harpers Ferry, Virginia, this location was chosen due to its proximity to a waterway that provided both a power source and transportation for this facility. A plentiful supply of walnut trees in the area near Enfield Lock became a ready source for musket stocks. Initially, musket parts were manufactured by private concerns and cottage industries in London and Birmingham. Interchangeability of parts and quality control were both sadly lacking under this arrangement. As the century progressed, so did technology. British ordnance officers had been considering possible replacements for the smoothbore Brown Bess, which had been the standard infantry arm for over 100 years. In 1823, the Royal Enfield Manufactory received an order for 5,000 Baker flintlock rifles. This order marked a new era in British military history, and these arms, with modifications, continued in service for 30 years. By the end of the decade, Enfield's workforce had undertaken the conversion of 30,000 flintlock muskets to percussion ignition. In 1841, a fire destroyed the government rifle shops at the Tower of London, consequently, Enfield took over many of the responsibilities formerly carried out at the Tower. At the same time, armory workers under the supervision of George Lovell, government inspector of small arms, began replacing the back-action locks of military Brunswick rifles with an improved bar-action design, and one year later, Lovell's design for a percussion musket went into production, marking another milestone in British arms production. In 1852, Lord Hardinge, Britain's Master General of Ordnance, began a search for a new military rifle, and gunsmiths were invited to submit designs for consideration. An ordnance committee at Enfield selected the best features from the various models that were submitted, and two experimental .577 caliber rifle-muskets were produced at Enfield. These featured three-groove rifling, and were far superior to earlier British military longarms. After a series of tests, this design was formally adopted as the Rifle Musket Pattern 1853, more commonly known as the Enfield rifle, and the government placed an initial order for 20,000 arms. As a result, the Royal Enfield Manufactory constructed new workshops and installed additional machinery, and annual production capacity soon reached 50,000 rifles. Carbine-length Enfields were also produced for use by cavalry, artillery, and naval troops. The performance of these arms was improved by the later adoption of the Pritchett bullet. The Enfield rifle was used with great effect in the Crimean War, and it soon achieved recognition as the finest European-produced military long arm. Despite the success of these arms, problems persisted in British manufacturing practices. Much of the work was done by outside sources, and tools were often the property of the craftsmen who performed these tasks. Quality control remained a concern among ordnance officials as well. A government commission visited the U.S. armories at Springfield and Harpers Ferry to observe American manufacturing practices. Subsequently, American machinery was purchased by Britain for use in the Royal Manufactory. During the American Civil War, both the Union and Confederate governments scrambled to obtain sufficient stocks of military arms. Federal forces were equipped from existing ordnance inventories, and new production was carried out at Springfield Armory and under contract at a number of private factories. The largely agrarian South lacked a suitable industrial base, and many Confederate units were armed with whatever they could find, from hunting arms to captured U.S. armaments. Additional production was carried out at several arsenals with tools and equipment captured at Harpers Ferry. Even these sources proved insufficient for meeting the needs of the field armies, and both North and South turned to Europe to procure additional arms and supplies. Over 500,000 Enfields were imported by the Union and Confederate governments, making these second only to the Springfield in terms of usage during the war. In addition to the standard .577 caliber Enfields, an experimental .45 caliber hexagonal bore model was produced. These yielded outstanding accuracy with their special fitted bullets, and although they were generally not issued as service arms, these Whitworths were used by Confederates as a sniper arm. After the war, armies on both sides of the Atlantic pushed for the adoption of breech loading rifles as a standard military arm. While the search continued for a suitable replacement to the muzzle-loading rifle-musket, both Great Britain and the United States began converting existing arms. American inventor Jacob Snider developed a breech-loading conversion method that required the re-manufacture of the rifle breech to accommodate a side-mounted locking hinged door through which fixed cartridges could be loaded. This system, similar to the "trap door" modification devised by Springfield Master Armorer Erskine S. Allin, was subsequently adopted by the British, and converted Enfield Sniders were fitted with new steel barrels in place of the original wrought-iron barrels. The Enfield Snider was replaced in 1871 by the .45 caliber Martini-Henry rifle. These single-shot lever-action breech loaders featured a Peabody breech system developed by Swiss inventor Friedrich von Martini and a barrel designed by Scotsman Alexander Henry. Much of the development work on these arms was carried out at Enfield. Subsequent rifle and carbine production for both the Army and Navy was also done at the Royal Manufactory. Many of these rifles were later fitted with .303 caliber barrels in 1895 after the adoption of the new smokeless British service cartridge. The single-shot design of the Martini-Henry eventually gave way to a new 8-round magazine rifle based on the bolt-action design of American designer James Paris Lee. Lee's action exhibited a significantly shorter bolt stroke and less bolt rotation than that of Mauser or Mannlicher bolt-action designs. These features, when coupled with the smooth operation of the Lee bolt made these rifles superior for rapid-fire. The rimmed .303 British cartridge presented a challenge with respect to reliable feeding, but this was offset by simplification of head space problems. As with earlier British military long arms, the experimental and developmental work that preceded the adoption of these rifles was conducted at Enfield. Introduced in 1889 as the Magazine Rifle Mark I, the new design featured Metford rifling, which had proven to be extremely accurate in competition at Wimbledon. In 1891, these arms became known as the Lee-Metford. The shallow Metford rifling proved to be unable to stand up to the wear produced by cordite propellants, and in 1895, the rifling was changed to a deeper, more robust type developed at Enfield. The re-designated Lee-Enfield made its appearance as a result of this change, and these arms would serve with British and Commonwealth forces well into the 20th century. Britain's experience in the Boer War led to the adoption of several modifications in the basic Lee-Enfield design. The Short Magazine Lee-Enfield (S.M.L.E.), also known as the No. 1 Rifle, was adopted in 1902. These were smaller and lighter than the earlier Lee-Enfield, hence the inclusion of the word "Short" in the original designation. To compensate for their reduced length, the S.M.L.E. bayonet was correspondingly longer than earlier models. These rifles also incorporated improved sights and bolt/receiver mechanisms, and the ability to re-load with charger clips. Magazine capacity was increased from 8 to 10 rounds. The slightly heavier No. 1 Mark III Rifle, which featured a magazine cut-off, was adopted in 1907. The No. 1 Rifle eventually replaced the carbine in Britain's inventory, and these are among the most famous arms ever produced at what had become known as the Royal Small Arms Factory. Over 2 million of these rugged long arms were manufactured at Enfield during the war years 1914-1918, and production continued after the war, both in England and at British arsenals in Ishapore, India and Lithgow, Australia. Many of these rifles continued in service with Commonwealth forces into the 1950s. A later bolt-action magazine rifle, designated the Pattern 1914, was inspired by the U.S. Model 1903 "Springfield." The only Mauser-pattern arm ever adopted by British forces, these rifles were developed at Enfield. Britain's involvement in the First World War prevented full-scale production in England, but the .303 British caliber P-14, later designated the Model 3, was produced in great numbers under contract in the United States by Winchester, and Remington, and at Eddystone Arsenal in Pennsylvania. P-14 and No. 1 rifles served as the workhorses for British, Canadian, Australian, and New Zealand troops during the war. More accurate than the No. 1, many P-14s were fitted with Aldis or Pattern 1918 telescopic sights for use by the British Army as sniper rifles. Later designated the Rifle No. 3, over 4 million P-14s were produced in .30-ï06 caliber as the U.S. Model 1917 Magazine Rifle for use by American troops "Over There." These were the principal U.S. battle rifle during the war, and many P-14s and M1917s continued in service with both British and American forces through the early days of the Second World War. After the Armistice, Britain's requirement for military rifles waned considerably, but experimentation at Enfield did not. The S.M.L.E. Mark V and Mark VI were both produced for trials, but neither entered production. However, the latter arm gave birth to the last Lee-Enfields to be produced: the Rifle No. 4 and the distinctive Rifle No. 5, also known as the Jungle Carbine, which was the only Lee-Enfield to feature a flash hider. Although developed at Enfield, these arms were produced elsewhere in Britain and Canada, and in the United States by Savage-Stevens Arms Corp. under the terms of Lend-Lease. During this period, Royal Small Arms Factory workers produced and repaired other firearm designs including the Czech/British Bren Light Machine Gun, the Sten Submachine Gun, the .38 caliber Revolver No. 2, and other arms. The No. 4 Rifle, adopted in 1926, was the mainstay of British forces throughout the Second World War. These arms incorporated some of the best features of the earlier No. 1 and P-14/No. 3 Rifles, including the No. 3's aperture rear sight, as well as a heavier barrel, simplified stock, improved bolt-retaining system, and a barrel that projected free from the fore end. The No. 4 Rifle Mark 1 (T), an accurized arm which featured an offset telescopic sight and wood cheekpiece, was introduced in 1942 as a sniper rifle. Some Second World War-produced Enfields feature kiln-dried walnut, beech or birch stocks, as supplies of seasoned walnut became increasingly difficult to obtain. The history of arms production at Enfield has closely mirrored that of Springfield Armory. These two facilities were founded within years of each other, and each had an influence on the products and processes of the other. For a number of years, both were the primary research, development, and production centers for military arms in their respective countries, until changing technologies and political climates pushed them out of the position that each had long occupied. Although Springfield Armory was closed by the U.S. Army, Enfield remains in operation. The Royal Small Arms Factory continues to produce British military rifles, but the Enfield name no longer enjoys the same association it once had with the nation's military forces.

In the rear, battalion and company commanders from both American divisions wrote after-action reports that provide a window into the seemingly chaotic American experience of being in the line for the first time.  In one report, a lieutenant in the 119th Infantry complained that his platoon’s ammunition supply was defective, and for twenty-four hours, he had no reserve rounds.  Another officer remarked how the supply of water that reached the front lines during the nights of 2-3 September was not enough for one platoon, and that “this shortage, which seems to exist in all parts of the line, is the greatest hardship the men have to bear.”

Other mistakes were not so insignificant and showed the weaknesses in the divisions’ officer corps.  Upon reaching an objective, a platoon commander could not communicate with his left flank because he did not have a telephone, lamp, pigeons, or even a signalman.  “Liaison was poor,” he complained.  “I had no ground flares, no panels, and no other means of getting in touch with aeroplanes.”

Such mishaps by the doughboys were also observed by the opposing German troops.  The commander of the German 8th Infantry Division, Major General Hamann, remarked in his battle report that “withdrawal of our line confronted the American troops with a task to which they were by no means equal.”  When the 27th Division moved out of its quiet sector to pursue the Germans, Hamann wrote, “The inexperienced troops do not yet know how to utilize the terrain in movement, work their way forward during an attack, or choose the correct formation in the event the enemy opens artillery fire.”

After the war, Hamann was more complimentary toward the New Yorkers.  O’Ryan had written him to gather information for his book, The Story of the 27th, and the German officer responded, saying “reports reaching me from all sources, particularly from our artillery observation posts, were that your infantry was unusually energetic in their attack.”

 

Enlisted men had plenty to say about the Ypres-Lys operation, and they wrote such thoughts in letters sent home, personal diaries, and memoirs.  The sound of battle created a lasting memory for many soldiers.   One soldier from Tennessee described the constant firing of machine guns as though it were “popcorn popping.”  Another wrote how it seemed to him that the Germans knew the location of every trench, since they constantly harassed the Americans during the day with artillery fire.  At night, their planes bombed the front and rear, and the “artificial camouflage provided what little deception was practiced upon the enemy.”  9

The historian of Company K, 117th Infantry, recalled that “the night of the big barrage on Kemmel Hill was a night of discomfort and nervousness” among the men in his unit.  Nerves were frayed, and one private recalled seeing a sergeant in his company advance cautiously with his rifle toward a noise in the rear that he insisted was caused by German soldiers conducting a raid.  Moments later, he learned it was a trench rat retreating to its hole.   Once the men of Company K actually participated in combat, they “were happier than we had been for many months, for the first battle experiences had been met with all the credit that was to have been expected, and we had not quailed at the smell of gunpowder.”

Bravery by the American soldiers did not go unnoticed by the British.  General Sir Herbert Plumer wrote O’Ryan that “the wonderful spirit that animated all ranks and the gallantry displayed in the minor engagements your division took part in with us foreshadowed the successes you would achieve later.”  Plumer was indeed correct.  The American II Corps would continue serve with the BEF and during the attack on the Hindenburg Line on 29 September 1918, with the Americans attached to the British Fourth Army.  Despite taking significant casualties, the 27th and 30th Divisions spearheaded the attack and with help from the Australian Corps, pierced a vital portion of the German defenses along the St. Quentin Canal.  Nevertheless, it was the operation in Ypres that helped define the two divisions.  After World War I, the newly established American Battle Monuments Commission recognized this in 1927 by placing a marker on Vierstraat Ridge.  It reads in part:  “Erected by the United States of America to commemorate the service of American troops who fought in this vicinity.”